Mark Vogel is a kind and caring physician and rationalist who rejects heroic medical care that lack sufficient evidence of effectiveness and value. When he advises an elderly patient to forego unproven treatment for her spreading cancer, his counsel runs counter to the wishes of the patient’s estranged son who prevails on his mother to submit to aggressive therapy. Mark’s philosophy is challenged when his wife, Fran, an academic, falls ill and they are forced to confront their different views on experimental treatment for her. A Good Doctor explores the conflicts its characters face when making choices in their anticipation of mortal disease. And it considers the places where they take comfort.


SYNOPSIS

The characters in this play wrestle with medical treatment decisions that individuals and their families approach differently, reflecting their needs to reconcile relationships and/or to hold fast to life.

As a policy person, I have been a strong proponent of “evidence-based medicine” (a manner of practice that relies on strong research findings before recommending invasive, aggressive, and often expensive therapies). Yet as a clinician, a friend, a family member I have come to understand the need that individuals and those who love them hold to retain hope when facing devastating illnesses. And how peoples’ differing belief systems can support them in finding resolution.


BACKGROUND ON THE PLAY

Mark Vogel – A doctor, 40ish (and 10 years younger)
Fran Emerson – A scholar, 40ish (and 10 years younger)
Mrs. Hodges – A patient, 80’s
Richard Hodges – Her son, 50ish


CHARACTER BREAKDOWN

The play is set in New York in the present and in a cottage in South Carolina 10 years previous.

ADDITIONAL NOTES

Staged reading at The Colony Theatre in Burbank, CA
Directed by John Frank Levey

PRODUCTION HISTORY

SAMPLE PAGES